CitizenGO logoCreate a petition

Victories

Dufferin-Peel Catholic School Trustees: Ensure Pride Flags Remain Off School Properties

Dufferin-Peel Catholic School Trustees: Ensure Pride Flags Remain Off School Properties

Dear Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board Trustees,

I am calling on you to stand firm against calls to alter the Board's flag policy.

Our schools must retain their focus on providing quality education, not political ideology, to our children.

The Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board policy against raising the Pride Flag upholds the Catholic Church's teachings and traditional values while remaining politically neutral and fair.

Undermining this past decision weakens the Board's commitment to parents and their beliefs.

Voting in favor of flying the Pride Flag will only continue to undermine parents' and citizens' confidence in the Board's ability to provide an authentic Catholic education—the very education the Board claims to deliver.

Furthermore, parents and citizens expect Catholic schools to hold and teach Catholic values and beliefs with charity and clarity for over 2000+ years.

Keeping with the current flag policy, you will maintain a school environment free from unnecessary ideological battles and political distractions that detract from our children's education.

Altering the flag policy will only further erode trust in our publicly-funded institutions.

Flying a politically charged flag that symbolizes "values" contradictory to the Catholic faith will only continue to destroy the integrity, stability, and unity of our communities and country.

Public education should not endorse the celebration of politically charged symbols.

I urge you to continue upholding the current flag policy and respect the Board's promise to champion Catholic values.

Do not betray the confidence and trust parents and citizens have in the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board to stop a sex symbol from flying outside their children's schools.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

Deal a Lethal Blow to the Pandemic Treaty: Tell Trump, Exit the WHO Now!

Deal a Lethal Blow to the Pandemic Treaty: Tell Trump, Exit the WHO Now!

Dear President Trump and Secretary Kennedy,

I am writing to urge you to follow through on your commitment to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) and its dangerous agreements.

Mr. President, in 2020, you began the process of withdrawing the US from the WHO, calling it “corrupt, dangerous, and bad for America.” Your recent commitment to finalize this withdrawal has given millions of people hope.

This decisive step would not only free the US from an unelected global body of bureaucrats but also strike a critical blow to the Pandemic Treaty—a globalist project that threatens our national sovereignty, crushes individual freedoms, silences dissent on important health issues, and prioritizes profits for globalist elites and Big Pharma over the well-being of ordinary citizens.

The United States is the WHO’s biggest funder, contributing over $1.3 billion of taxpayer money just last year. By withdrawing now, you would deal a major blow to its dangerous agenda and block the Pandemic Treaty from ever becoming a reality, securing our constitutional freedoms once and for all.

I strongly encourage you to act immediately upon taking office and fulfill the promises that so many are counting on.

I trust in your commitment to protect American sovereignty, safeguard the individual freedoms of citizens worldwide, and prevent unelected elites from dictating global health policies.

Sincerely,

YOUR NAME

End Porn Distribution in Manitoba Schools

End Porn Distribution in Manitoba Schools

Dear Principal Mark Keown, Education Minister Nello Altomare, Deputy Minister Brian O'Leary, and Premier Wab Kinew,

I am severely disturbed about the explicit sex education kits recently distributed at Virden Collegiate Institute.

Graphic and inappropriate "sex education" materials were handed out to impressionable teenagers.

The kits, containing a fake wooden penis, multiple condoms, and a pornographic flip book, are a shockingly inappropriate method of education.

This is not educating our children; it is sexualized education designed to drag them into dangerous sexual behaviors and lifestyles.

I expect our publicly funded schools to protect our youth but not expose them to sexual content, including graphic pornography that glorifies predatory sexual behaviors.

Furthermore, school nursing staff distributing these kits is not just a misuse of resources but a violation of our trust.

Parents entrust their children's education to you, expecting them to receive quality education that will make them successful.

Our public education should not expose our kids to the perverted sexual fantasies of "adults."

I implore you to immediately halt the distribution of these kits from our schools and take action to prevent similar future instances.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

SENATORS: Halt Expansion of Euthanasia to Mentally Ill and Drug Addicts Now!

SENATORS: Halt Expansion of Euthanasia to Mentally Ill and Drug Addicts Now!

Dear Senators,

As a concerned citizen of Canada, I stand firmly against the proposed expansion of euthanasia to encompass individuals with mental illnesses and drug addictions, a measure scheduled to take effect unless legislative action, specifically Bill C-62, is taken to prevent its implementation on March 17.

It is deeply troubling that, despite delaying the decision last year in favor of continued investigation and deliberation, the trajectory still points towards including our citizens struggling with such profound health challenges in the existing Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) policy come March.

The course currently charted for our society effectively diminishes the value placed on the lives of Canadians contending with psychological and addiction issues, suggesting eligibility for state-sanctioned premature death. This notion is both chilling and reminiscent of genocidal ideologies that history has come to condemn unanimously.

This expansion strips us of our humane obligations towards our vulnerable — to support and care for them rather than amending our laws to deem them expendable based on convenience.

Furthermore, countless Psychiatric professionals have continued to argue over which vague benchmarks should constitute 'irremediability' in these mental health and drug addiction cases.

There is no objective agreement on what mental illnesses or drug addictions should be considered "lost causes." Avoiding any action resulting in underestimating human life's intrinsic value would be wise.

By allowing euthanasia for the mentally ill and drug-dependent, the government is sending a clear message to Canadians: "It is better to use a death warrant instead of providing people with charitable acts of hope and compassion."

Given this expansion's un-Canadian approach to compassionately helping those in need, I implore you to denounce this extension of Canada's euthanasia laws.

I will not allow euthanasia-on-demand to be the legacy we bestow upon future generations.

Standing against this expansion will not only honor the lives of our most vulnerable but also send a clear message that Canadians genuinely care about those who suffer from mental illnesses and drug addictions.

Sincerely,

Demand London’s City Councilors Do NOT Ban Life-Saving Speech & Charter Rights

Demand London’s City Councilors Do NOT Ban Life-Saving Speech & Charter Rights

Dear Mayor Josh Morgan and London City Councilors,

I urgently call upon you to reject the proposed amendment to the 2022 bylaw, "Graphic Image Delivery - PW14", seeking to ban pro-life demonstrations and discussions on public sidewalks that display "graphic images" of unborn children.

This amendment violates our fundamental rights to freedom of speech and expression, as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms recognizes.

As you may be aware, your fellow City Councilors, Hadleigh McAlister and Sam Trosow, are attempting to silence a crucial conversation that our society needs to have.

By banning these images, they stifle dialogue, hinder public education on the issue, and prevent countless individuals from making informed decisions that protect human life, including individuals' most vulnerable moments within their mothers' wombs.

It is important to remember that the right not to be offended does not exist in Canadian law.

Suppressing the freedom of speech and expression because some may find it uncomfortable is not a valid justification.

As a citizen who believes in free and open public discussion, I must be willing to face the truth and engage in meaningful conversations, even if it challenges my own personally held beliefs.

I believe we should be encouraging, not censoring, these discussions within public spaces, as the public debate is a critical pillar in having an open and fair democratic society that values fundamental human rights and freedoms.

Please stand up for my fundamental rights and do not pass this amendment, which infringes on our cherished freedom of speech and expression.

By opposing this amendment, you will foster a genuinely fair and free society that values open dialogue and the exchange of different ideas.

Sincerely,

Let us stand for freedom of speech in Europe

Let us stand for freedom of speech in Europe

On 9 December 2021, the European Commission proposed to extend the list of EU crimes to hate speech and hate crimes to Article 83(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

The proposal of the European Commission is against Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Additionally, hate speech and hate crimes are not sufficiently clear concepts and can be easily misused. In fact, the European Commission has failed to give a definition of what it seeks to criminalize as hate speech and for that reason, EU harmonization in the area of hate speech is not possible.

Therefore, we ask you to stand up for freedom of expression and denounce the extension of the list of EU crimes to hate speech and hate crimes.